<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Com Laude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.comlaude.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.comlaude.com</link>
	<description>Protecting intellectual property across the domain name system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ICANN springs batching surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.comlaude.com/icann-springs-batching-surprise</link>
		<comments>http://www.comlaude.com/icann-springs-batching-surprise#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts' Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New gTLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new gTLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comlaude.com/?p=1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astonishment. Shock. Disbelief. It’s probably fair to say that ICANN’s chosen method for creating batches of new gTLD applications announced last week evoked some of these emotions for people close to the programme. <a href="http://www.comlaude.com/icann-springs-batching-surprise">Read more &#8250;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.comlaude.com/icann-springs-batching-surprise/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The controversy over the .ss top-level domain</title>
		<link>http://www.comlaude.com/the-controversy-over-the-ss-top-level-domain</link>
		<comments>http://www.comlaude.com/the-controversy-over-the-ss-top-level-domain#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Theo Docherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain name industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.ss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ccTLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Sudan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comlaude.com/?p=1365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When South Sudan became the world’s newest country last July, it set about nation building. This included establishing a country-code top level domain (ccTLD), for which the nation wanted .ss. Although the SS string appeared on the International Standards Organisation’s ISO 3166-1-alpha-2 code list in August, the forerunner to ICANN approval for a ccTLD, .ss is still not plugged into the internet. <a href="http://www.comlaude.com/the-controversy-over-the-ss-top-level-domain">Read more &#8250;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.comlaude.com/the-controversy-over-the-ss-top-level-domain/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fielding new gTLD enquiries on the frontline</title>
		<link>http://www.comlaude.com/fielding-new-gtld-enquiries-on-the-frontline</link>
		<comments>http://www.comlaude.com/fielding-new-gtld-enquiries-on-the-frontline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hayath Hussein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Com Laude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New gTLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valideus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comlaude.com/?p=1328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the experiences we’ve had over the past few weeks is that of companies and organisations hearing about the new gTLD programme and calling us with questions - and sometimes demands. <a href="http://www.comlaude.com/fielding-new-gtld-enquiries-on-the-frontline">Read more &#8250;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.comlaude.com/fielding-new-gtld-enquiries-on-the-frontline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain name transfers: tracking your technical settings</title>
		<link>http://www.comlaude.com/domain-name-transfers-tracking-your-technical-settings</link>
		<comments>http://www.comlaude.com/domain-name-transfers-tracking-your-technical-settings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phillipa Pook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts' Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nameservers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comlaude.com/?p=1322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transferring a domain name can be more complicated than you might first expect. It’s not difficult, but you have to take care of all the fine details. In performing transfers recently, I’ve noticed that a lot of people forget about the importance of a domain name’s technical settings. <a href="http://www.comlaude.com/domain-name-transfers-tracking-your-technical-settings">Read more &#8250;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.comlaude.com/domain-name-transfers-tracking-your-technical-settings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

